Ranveer Allahbadia aka BeerBiceps: The Selective Outrage & Political Angle Behind the Controversy

Popular YouTuber and podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia aka BeerBiceps is facing legal trouble after a complaint was filed against him for allegedly promoting obscenity during a recent appearance on a show hosted by comedian Samay Raina. However, what seems like a case of moral policing at first glance appears to have deeper political and ideological undertones.

While many guests have appeared on the same show and made similar comments, none have faced backlash—except Ranveer. The real question is: Is this outrage truly about content?

The Controversial Episode: What Really Happened?

Ranveer, known for his motivational content, spiritual discussions, and thought-provoking podcasts, has been a vocal admirer of the show India’s Got Latent. On multiple occasions, he has recommended it to his audience, calling it “the YouTube of 2025”, emphasizing its unique comedic style.

When he was invited as a guest, he approached it with the same enthusiasm he had expressed before—blending into the show’s tone and humor. However, like previous guests who played along, Ranveer actively engaged, making remarks in the same vein as others before him.

Despite this, only he faced legal consequences amongst all the guests

Selective Targeting: Why Only Ranveer Allahbadia?

The show has hosted over 100 guests, with five new guests per episode, many of whom have made equally bold and provocative statements. Yet, none of them have been dragged into controversy.

So why is Ranveer being singled out?

The Bigger Picture: Media Bias & Political Exploitation

The mainstream media has largely focused on his comment rather than the larger context:

Why is no one talking about the other guests who said similar things?
If this is about moral policing, why haven’t the previous episodes been scrutinized?

It is clear that this isn’t just about obscenity but about political bias and media manipulation.

Why This Matters for Content Creators & Free Speech

This case sets a dangerous precedent. If content creators are penalized selectively based on their political leanings, it discourages free expression and encourages self-censorship.